Protecting Our Environment

Are Organic Foods Better for the Environment?

Consumer
Life is full of choices. What’s the right career path for you? Where should you live? Should you start a family? And, of course . . . *drum roll please* . . . organic or non-organic?

OK, maybe this one doesn’t rise to the level of major life decision, but when you’re staring at a wall of options at the grocery store, it can give you pause. If you’re looking to help the planet while putting food on your table, what’s the best choice?

As it turns out, there isn’t really a cut-and-dry “best.” Both organic and conventional farming affect the environment in different ways — and farms don’t divide neatly into two simple categories. Conventional farms aren’t all the same, and organic farms aren’t all the same. Individual farmers make their own choices, using a variety of approaches that all come with their own benefits and tradeoffs.

Let’s take a look.

Woman on market

What’s in a Name?

First, what does organic actually mean?

There are lots of definitions out there, which vary depending on where you live, but to paraphrase the Irish Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine: Organic farming aims to control pests, diseases and weeds with approaches such as crop rotations, using recycled organic materials (like animal manure), and non-chemical methods. This generally means no synthetic pesticides, but when non-chemical approaches fail, organic farmers do have access to a limited number of pesticides, mostly from natural sources.

So, what does this mean for the environment? We asked Rob Wallbridge, an organic agronomist in Quebec, for his perspective (hint: that means he’s an expert in organic farming).

“To say that organic farmers make decisions that prioritize things like soil health, water quality, and biodiversity may be true to some varying degree,” Rob says. “But I think it's more accurate to say that the organic standards help channel farmers into making decisions that are more likely to result in these benefits. For example, without access to economical, easy-to-use synthetic herbicides and insecticides, organic farmers are more likely to end up with a greater diversity of habitat for, and populations of, beneficial insects. Those beneficials, in turn, provide a large part of the pest control function that insecticides would otherwise provide.”

Sounds great, right? But benefits like this come with tradeoffs.

“The tradeoffs are less convenience, less predictability, less control, and a higher degree of risk,” Rob says. “Which is why it's not for everyone and a large part of the justification for premium prices.”

Consider This

So, if you’re trying to assess the overall environmental effects of farming approaches, what are the key things to consider? Let’s dig in — but keep in mind that all of these will depend greatly on the specific conditions of each farm.
Land Use

Land Use

Synthetic pesticides and fertilizers, along with other modern conventional farming tools, have allowed farmers to make big gains in productivity, getting more food out their land. Since organic farming doesn’t include many of these tools, yields tend to be lower than in conventional farming. In other words, you need more land to grow the same amount of food. And what are the environmental consequences of using more land? Let’s look at biodiversity.
Biodiversity

Biodiversity

Organic farmland specifically focuses on providing better conditions for wildlife, through things like integrated pest control and weed control requirements. However, in order to create the additional farmland required for organic farming to produce the same amount of food as conventional farming, you need to clear more land — and land-clearing can decrease biodiversity by destroying or dividing up habitats. Is it more environmentally friendly to farm a larger area using methods that are more supportive of biodiversity or farm a smaller area using methods that are less supportive? Scientists don’t know — the research is inconclusive, and results will vary depending on the location of the farm. In one area, organic farming may be better for biodiversity, while in another, conventional farming may be the better bet.
Herbicide

Fertilizers and Pesticides

Fertilizers and pesticides tend to dominate discussions about organic and non-organic food. Fertilizers are used to nourish plants, while pesticides serve to protect them from pests and diseases. While synthetic fertilizers and pesticides are convenient, manufacturing them produces greenhouse gas emissions. Plus, when not used correctly, these chemicals may accidentally hurt other living things, in addition to pests. However, the World Health Organization says, “pesticides need not be hazardous if suitable precautions are taken.”

Meanwhile, organic farmers can use non-synthetic fertilizers — such as manure and mined minerals — along with certain biological pesticides. We’re going to take the high road and skip the elementary school jokes, but let’s just say manure is, um, naturally produced.

But “natural” doesn’t necessarily mean these chemicals have no impact on the environment. For example, while synthetic fertilizers release nutrients when the crops need them, manure can sometimes release excess nutrients. The rain can wash away excess nutrients from fertilizers, manure, and even urban areas and they may end up in rivers and lakes. And too many nutrients in the water can cause eutrophication. That’s a fancy word to describe how excess nutrients can reduce water quality and threaten fish and aquatic plant habitats.

Soil

Soil

Organic farms tend to have healthier soil, thanks to their greater diversity of life. However, since organic farmers don’t use synthetic pesticides, they often depend on tilling (stirring up fields, using methods like plowing) as a means of controlling weeds. And tilling fields can contribute to soil erosion, which reduces the supply of healthy soil. Modern herbicides and genetically-engineered seeds can make it easier for conventional farmers to adopt no-till or low-till methods.
A lot to consider, right? It’s not a black and white question. And there’s no need to take sides in an “organic vs. conventional” debate. With so many benefits and tradeoffs in play, it’s easy to see why some farmers adopt one method, while others adopt another and a great number combine practices from each approach. And by learning more about the challenges farmers tackle and the decisions they make, we can all make more informed food choices that align with our values.
Current Readers´ rating (20)
All Comments

Sushil Kumar
September 04, 2019 - 08:25 AM

Eye opening post and i really enjoyed it. I have been a supporter of organic food from last 5 years.
The problem with human behavior is that they eat food by just their look and taste and they never think about the quality of the food. So, awareness is very important to let them know the value of organic farming and how conventional farming is affecting our body and environment.

Current Readers´ rating (1)

facsimborio
May 17, 2019 - 06:24 AM

too much food is wasted everyday...

Current Readers´ rating (1)

Farm Meets Table Team
May 17, 2019 - 06:56 AM

facsimborio -

It is a big challenge. We took a look at some of the ways of addressing the problem from the field all the way to the home and highlighted a few organizations that are working to solve it. Check it out here if you're interested.

https://www.farmmeetstable.com/en/providing-safe-nutritious-food/2018/how-we-lose-food

Current Readers´ rating (1)

M. Fieldman
May 15, 2019 - 12:01 PM

The article does shy away from the bigger picture of over population and the necessary change in consumer habits/education. Yield isn't everything, the world needs to address also consumption habits and the demanding attitude to buy saisonal farming products anytime, anywhere at "no" cost - educating customers on what they eat and where it comes from. Also there is no discussion that organics are the product of choice if affordable.

Current Readers´ rating (5)

The Farm Meets Table Team
May 16, 2019 - 12:54 PM

Thank you for sharing your thoughts, M. We agree that feeding the world is a complex challenge that calls for multifaceted solutions and approaches. The rising population combined with a growing middle-class globally are major dynamics shaping the need to produce more with less. We dig into this topic more in our article "Why We Grow": https://www.farmmeetstable.com/en/protecting-our-environment/2018/why-we-grow

Current Readers´ rating (1)

wolverine70
April 06, 2019 - 08:32 AM

Excellent analysis. Any human activity will have an environmental impact, this includes farming. This article presents a balanced view of the tradeoffs of modern vs. organic farming. I have to come down on the side of getting higher yields from less land. There simply isn't enough farmland for a hungry world to waste on vanity projects like 'organic' farming.

Current Readers´ rating (6)

Farm Meets Table Team
April 08, 2019 - 01:14 PM

Thanks very much for sharing your thoughts! We’re happy to have a place to talk about the many approaches farmers employ and hear different perspectives. Are there any topics you’d like to learn more about?

Current Readers´ rating (1)

Eric Bjerregaard
March 27, 2019 - 04:45 PM

Try not interviewing an organic apologist. Rob's answers are misleading. There is no justification or benefit to organic.

Current Readers´ rating (10)

Comment